← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Comfort Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-08-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0592 0.0655 0.1750 0.1937
2022-23 NAHL 40 2 7 9 0.225 0.0799 0.0845 0.2362 0.2499
2023-24 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 57 4 12 16 0.281 0.0997 0.1007 0.2947 0.2977
2024-25 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 59 2 20 22 0.373 0.1325 0.1269 0.3915 0.3749
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 26 0 2 2 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2025-26 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
-30.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13706
Defenseman overall
#2741
Defenseman born in 2004
#4497
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2017-18
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2021-22
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.