← New Search ↗ Social Card

Valtteri Piironen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-09-11 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0615 0.0659 0.2946 0.3155
2019-20 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 39 0 2 2 0.051 0.0315 0.0315 0.1511 0.1511
2020-21 Lukko U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 4 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 47 1 2 3 0.064 0.0392 0.0361 0.1880 0.1730
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ferris State D1 CCHA 29 1 6 7 0.241
2024-25 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA GR 34 1 11 12 0.353
2023-24 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA SR 31 3 9 12 0.387
2022-23 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA JR 32 1 9 10 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2022-23 · Long Island Univ.
+589.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27528
Defenseman overall
#3748
Defenseman born in 2001
#4238
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Augsburg · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2011-12
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.