IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Foddrill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Maine Nordiques NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Maine Nordiques NAHL 35 2 4 6 0.171 0.0630 0.0703 0.1809 0.2019
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 2 2 0.667
2024-25 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 2 2 0.667
2023-24 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 2 2 0.667
2022-23 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 2 2 0.667
2021-22 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 2 2 0.667
2020-21 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 3 0 2 2 0.667

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#53667
Forward overall
#3715
Forward born in 2005
#6181
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Blake Christensen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ American International (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jack Billings
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Niagara
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Sheehy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Connor Hurley
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Biagio Lerario
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeremy Gabriele
Endicott · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Buchanan
Hamline · 2004-05
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Freeborn
Adrian · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.