← New Search ↗ Social Card

Simon Houge Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-09-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 27 0 17 17 0.630 0.1695 0.1695 0.1529 0.1529
2020-21 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 20 2 25 27 1.350 0.3634 0.3634 0.3279 0.3279
2021-22 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 29 5 21 26 0.897 0.2414 0.2414
2022-23 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 10 0 2 2 0.200 0.0792 0.0842 0.2100 0.2234
2023-24 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 43 2 13 15 0.349 0.1299 0.1294 0.5082 0.5064
2024-25 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 53 6 21 27 0.509 0.1898 0.1796 0.7422 0.7023
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Air Force D1 AHA FR 13 0 1 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2025-26 · Air Force
-48.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11094
Defenseman overall
#2342
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2010-11
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2017-18
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.