← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Persi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Wyoming Seminary NE-Prep 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0214 0.0214 0.0508 0.0508
2019-20 Wyoming Seminary NE-Prep 20 0 1 1 0.050 0.0096 0.0096 0.0229 0.0229
2020-21 Express Hockey Club EHL 35 8 3 11 0.314 0.0460 0.0460 0.1541 0.1541
2021-22 Express Hockey Club EHL 38 6 14 20 0.526 0.0770 0.0750
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 26 1 1 2 0.077
2024-25 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 20 1 1 2 0.100
2023-24 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 24 4 1 5 0.208
2022-23 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 19 0 2 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2022-23 · Castleton
+151.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41901
Forward overall
#2364
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2000-01
0.071 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2012-13
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2015-16
0.105 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.