IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-09-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2007-08 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 41 0 3 3 0.073 0.0246 0.0256 0.0677 0.0703
2008-09 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 37 0 4 4 0.108 0.0417 0.0415 0.1573 0.1564
2009-10 Calgary Royals AJHL 47 1 15 16 0.340 0.1142 0.1080 0.3150 0.2980
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Marian D3 NCHA — 23 1 6 7 0.304
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2010-11 · Marian
+296.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22347
Defenseman overall
#1811
Defenseman born in 1989
#2391
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Christian
St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bittner
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Donaldson
Johnson & Wales · 2013-14
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.