← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kade Shea Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Duluth Denfeld USHS-MN 28 23 29 52 1.857 0.2288 0.2288 0.4511 0.4511
2020-21 Duluth Denfeld USHS-MN 16 15 16 31 1.938 0.2387 0.2387 0.4706 0.4706
2021-22 Austin Bruins NAHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 53 5 15 20 0.377 0.1341 0.1330 0.3962 0.3931
2023-24 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 60 17 26 43 0.717 0.2546 0.2404 0.7525 0.7106
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 26 4 4 8 0.308
2024-25 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 8 2 0 2 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2024-25 · Wisconsin-Superior
+47.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26586
Forward overall
#1498
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2017-18
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.