IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sylas Oberting Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Exeter NE-Prep 30 0 2 2 0.067 0.0128 0.0128 0.0304 0.0304
2020-21 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 13 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 9 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 59 2 14 16 0.271 0.0964 0.0911 0.2861 0.2705
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Tufts D3 NESCAC GR 25 3 4 7 0.280
2024-25 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 26 0 4 4 0.154
2023-24 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 26 1 1 2 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2023-24 · Tufts
+36.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25520
Defenseman overall
#3774
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tony DeVito
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gregg Amato
SUNY Brockport · 2007-08
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shigenobu Kakudate
Finlandia · 2011-12
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.