IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Griffin Zaske Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-12-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 — NAHL 11 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 49 1 4 5 0.102 0.0362 0.0371 0.1071 0.1097
2023-24 — NAHL 49 5 2 7 0.143 0.0508 0.0496 0.1500 0.1464
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 12 14 0.518
2024-25 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 12 14 0.518
2023-24 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 12 14 0.518
2022-23 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 12 14 0.518
2021-22 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 12 14 0.518
2020-21 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 27 2 12 14 0.518

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28110
Defenseman overall
#4218
Defenseman born in 2003
#6811
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Billy McGwin
Salem State · 2017-18
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Lecey
Nichols · 2011-12
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jimmy Morgan
Fredonia · 2014-15
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.