IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Ahlrik Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-25 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 HV71 U20 SuperElit 46 6 16 22 0.478 0.1874 0.1899 0.5875 0.5952
2022-23 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 53 18 30 48 0.906 0.3588 0.3637 0.9509 0.9640
2023-24 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 47 20 18 38 0.808 0.3203 0.3094 0.8488 0.8199
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SO 36 11 16 27 0.750
2024-25 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA — 35 6 6 12 0.343
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2024-25 · Lake Superior State
+21.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13910
Forward overall
#675
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Della Paolera
Anna Maria · 2021-22
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Craner
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Simons
Endicott · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.