← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wyatt Stefan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 54 10 16 26 0.481 0.1769 0.1936 0.5082 0.5562
2023-24 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 53 22 22 44 0.830 0.3050 0.3192 0.8763 0.9171
2024-25 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 27 5 3 8 0.296 0.1089 0.1083 0.3127 0.3109
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 22 7 7 14 0.636
2024-25 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 22 7 7 14 0.636
2023-24 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 22 7 7 14 0.636
2022-23 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 22 7 7 14 0.636
2021-22 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 22 7 7 14 0.636
2020-21 University of Arizona ACHA_D1 22 7 7 14 0.636

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27656
Forward overall
#1598
Forward born in 2005
#2359
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2023-24
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.