IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jon Bell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 St. Cloud Cathedral USHS-MN 30 4 17 21 0.700 0.1884 0.1884 0.1700 0.1700
2020-21 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 47 1 9 10 0.213 0.0843 0.0843 0.2234 0.2234
2021-22 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 51 9 17 26 0.510 0.2020 0.2020 — —
2022-23 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 23 1 2 3 0.130 0.0517 0.0492 0.1369 0.1302
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Army D1 AHA GR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Army D1 AHA SR 27 0 4 4 0.148
2023-24 Army D1 AHA JR 18 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15966
Defenseman overall
#2868
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Mezzano
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Moss
Connecticut College · 2016-17
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Moses
Elmira · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.