IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Mezzano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 11 1 1 2 0.182 0.0580 0.0590 0.1407 0.1431
2011-12 Minot Minotauros NAHL 41 0 6 6 0.146 0.0580 0.0576 0.1536 0.1526
2012-13 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 54 4 10 14 0.259 0.1027 0.0969 0.2722 0.2568
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — SR 26 2 3 5 0.192
2015-16 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — JR 25 1 8 9 0.360
2014-15 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — SO 26 4 18 22 0.846
2013-14 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — FR 24 3 9 12 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2013-14 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+552.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20699
Defenseman overall
#1970
Defenseman born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Gingher
St. Norbert · 2024-25
0.567 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Whitehead
Middlebury · 2021-22
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Roberts
Marian · 2008-09
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.