← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeremiah Konkel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Southwest Christian/Richfield USHS-MN 27 13 22 35 1.296 0.1597 0.1597 0.3149 0.3149
2020-21 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 35 5 12 17 0.486 0.0537 0.0537 0.1539 0.1539
2021-22 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 43 25 27 52 1.209 0.1337 0.1302 0.3831 0.3730
2022-23 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 36 5 7 12 0.333 0.1184 0.1114 0.3499 0.3293
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bethel D3 MIAC GR 23 4 4 8 0.348
2024-25 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 23 6 4 10 0.435
2023-24 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 25 3 4 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2023-24 · Bethel
+175.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32358
Forward overall
#1928
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2016-17
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2013-14
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2022-23
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.