← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Miner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-01-29 Country: Canada
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 48 4 4 8 0.167 0.0612 0.0662 0.1760 0.1903
2023-24 Chippewa Steel NAHL 59 7 23 30 0.508 0.1868 0.1930 0.5367 0.5546
2024-25 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 46 4 11 15 0.326 0.1256 0.1210 0.4746 0.4573
2025-26 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 54 4 13 17 0.315 0.1213 0.1124 0.4581 0.4246
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12048
Defenseman overall
#2449
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.06
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.17
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.25
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.11
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wesleyan · 2024-25
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2017-18
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.