← New Search ↗ Social Card

Barron Stibbe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Fargo Davies (N.D.) USHS-MN 2 0 2 2 1.000 0.1266 0.1266 0.2429 0.2429
2022-23 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 19 2 4 6 0.316 0.0809 0.0816 0.2381 0.2402
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 8 7 15 0.441
2024-25 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 8 7 15 0.441
2023-24 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 8 7 15 0.441
2022-23 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 8 7 15 0.441
2021-22 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 8 7 15 0.441
2020-21 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 8 7 15 0.441
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2020-21 · Ohio University
+307.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45720
Forward overall
#2977
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2009-10
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2005-06
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2005-06
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.