← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dante Palombo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Kent School NE-Prep 26 6 8 14 0.538 0.1039 0.1039 0.2464 0.2464
2020-21 Kent School NE-Prep 5 4 4 8 1.600 0.3086 0.3086 0.7322 0.7322
2021-22 Kent School NE-Prep 28 22 18 40 1.429 0.2756 0.2756 0.6537 0.6537
2022-23 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 9 0 4 4 0.444 0.1579 0.1620 0.4666 0.4787
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SR 26 7 6 13 0.500
2024-25 Middlebury D3 NESCAC JR 26 6 12 18 0.692
2023-24 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SO 25 4 7 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2023-24 · Middlebury
+147.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15718
Forward overall
#777
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Michael's College · 2013-14
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.