IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drake Nabozny Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-08-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 — NAHL 54 0 3 3 0.056 0.0204 0.0216 0.0587 0.0621
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 34 5 22 27 0.794
2024-25 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 34 5 22 27 0.794
2023-24 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 34 5 22 27 0.794
2022-23 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 34 5 22 27 0.794
2021-22 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 34 5 22 27 0.794
2020-21 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 34 5 22 27 0.794

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30908
Defenseman overall
#4596
Defenseman born in 2004
#7018
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

RJay Berra
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Veitch
Johnson & Wales · 2011-12
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Herzog
Castleton · 2007-08
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.