← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Svenddal Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-12-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Blake USHS-MN 31 1 9 10 0.323 0.0397 0.0397 0.0784 0.0784
2020-21 Blake USHS-MN 18 2 14 16 0.889 0.1095 0.1095 0.2159 0.2159
2021-22 Blake USHS-MN 27 8 11 19 0.704 0.0867 0.0867 0.1709 0.1709
2022-23 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 21 1 0 1 0.048 0.0169 0.0173 0.0500 0.0512
2023-24 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 55 1 6 7 0.127 0.0452 0.0441 0.1337 0.1306
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 26 1 5 6 0.231
2024-25 Bethel D3 MIAC 23 1 4 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2024-25 · Bethel
+590.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21774
Defenseman overall
#3592
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2016-17
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2016-17
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.