← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Chapman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Salisbury School NE-Prep 26 2 2 4 0.154 0.0434 0.0434 0.0704 0.0704
2022-23 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 27 2 4 6 0.222 0.1239 0.1289 0.2625 0.2722
2023-24 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 56 3 7 10 0.179 0.0708 0.0700 0.1875 0.1854
2024-25 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 56 7 19 26 0.464 0.1840 0.1723 0.4875 0.4565
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Army D1 AHA FR 20 1 3 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2025-26 · Army
+61.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12389
Defenseman overall
#2537
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2018-19
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.