IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wyatt Hickok Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-01-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Northern Cyclones NCDC 38 5 6 11 0.289 0.0669 0.0685 0.2341 0.2396
2022-23 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 19 0 1 1 0.053 0.0187 0.0183 0.0552 0.0540
2023-24 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 53 3 24 27 0.509 0.1105 0.1001 0.3943 0.3570
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 6 0 1 1 0.167
2024-25 St. Olaf D3 MIAC — 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14456
Defenseman overall
#2747
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Boyce
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lane Boswell
Marian · 2007-08
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Lyon
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.