IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Johnny Thrasher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-01-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Minnetonka USHS-MN 13 1 4 5 0.385 0.1035 0.1035 0.0934 0.0934
2021-22 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 26 3 12 15 0.577 0.1553 0.1553 0.1401 0.1401
2022-23 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 28 0 11 11 0.393 0.0904 0.0918 — —
2023-24 Wisconsin Woodsmen NA3HL 38 1 8 9 0.237 0.0545 0.0527 0.0750 0.0725
2024-25 Wisconsin Woodsmen NA3HL 43 6 17 23 0.535 0.1230 0.1125 0.1695 0.1551
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Beloit D3 WIAC FR 7 1 0 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2025-26 · Beloit
+70.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18075
Defenseman overall
#3293
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Dowd
Salem State · 2021-22
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Stewart
Elmira · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Williams
Stevenson · 2015-16
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.