← New Search ↗ Social Card

Médrick Bolduc Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Fresno Monsters USPHL-Premier 12 5 8 13 1.083 0.3571 0.3571 0.3685 0.3685
2021-22 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 44 11 14 25 0.568 0.3168 0.3322 0.4594 0.4818
2022-23 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 50 15 36 51 1.020 0.5688 0.5727 0.8248 0.8304
2023-24 El Paso Rhinos NAHL 58 19 26 45 0.776 0.3074 0.2937 0.8146 0.7782
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA 32 2 3 5 0.156
2024-25 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA 26 2 3 5 0.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2024-25 · Northern Michigan
-44.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9146
Forward overall
#390
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2005-06
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2018-19
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.