← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Gagnon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-04-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Cornwall Colts CCHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0639 0.0639 0.1548 0.1548
2020-21 Cornwall Colts CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Cornwall Colts CCHL 55 2 25 27 0.491 0.1567 0.1595 0.3800 0.3867
2022-23 Cornwall Colts CCHL 55 9 30 39 0.709 0.2264 0.2202 0.5489 0.5340
2023-24 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 58 8 34 42 0.724 0.2869 0.2709 0.7602 0.7177
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 16 0 3 3 0.188
2024-25 Alaska Anchorage D1 20 0 2 2 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2024-25 · Alaska Anchorage
-57.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4796
Defenseman overall
#1225
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2017-18
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2010-11
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.