IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Cappello Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-26 Country: USA
Niagara
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 56 11 15 26 0.464 0.1706 0.1812 0.4901 0.5205
2024-25 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 50 12 16 28 0.560 0.2057 0.2077 0.5911 0.5967
2025-26 — NAHL 51 10 16 26 0.510 0.1873 0.1799 0.5381 0.5167
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27229
Forward overall
#1568
Forward born in 2005
#2300
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Niagara Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nicolas Carrier
CCHL 2015-16
0.22
actual FR PPG at Niagara
Jack Billings
CCHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Niagara
Lars Christian Rødne
NAHL 2020-21
0.37
actual FR PPG at Niagara
Shane Ott
NAHL 2020-21
0.50
actual FR PPG at Niagara

D2/3 Comparables

C.J. Stubbs
SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Rossbach
Framingham State · 2022-23
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeffrey Beck
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.