← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Reiners Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-05-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 49 0 12 12 0.245 0.1505 0.1505 0.7215 0.7215
2020-21 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 51 3 13 16 0.314 0.1928 0.1928 0.9242 0.9242
2021-22 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 38 4 10 14 0.368 0.2265 0.2044 1.0854 0.9794
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SR 36 2 7 9 0.250
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 36 0 3 3 0.083
2023-24 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SO 26 0 3 3 0.115
2022-23 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC FR 28 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6747
Defenseman overall
#1486
Defenseman born in 2001
#2734
in USHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.