IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Boulanger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Holderness NE-Prep 30 1 2 3 0.100 0.0198 0.0198 0.0456 0.0456
2019-20 Holderness NE-Prep 24 3 4 7 0.292 0.0578 0.0578 0.1329 0.1329
2021-22 Holderness NE-Prep 27 13 29 42 1.556 0.3082 0.3082 0.7087 0.7087
2022-23 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 39 2 13 15 0.385 0.1482 0.1455 0.5597 0.5494
2023-24 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 35 9 14 23 0.657 0.2414 0.2306 0.6936 0.6625
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Air Force D1 AHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19487
Forward overall
#1004
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jaden Davis
Aurora · 2024-25
1.031 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Larry Jungwirth
Aurora · 2017-18
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Thompson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2004-05
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.