← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Mesenburg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Omaha Lancers USHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 26 13 15 28 1.077 0.1363 0.1363
2020-21 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 53 10 10 20 0.377 0.1387 0.1387 0.3983 0.3983
2021-22 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 59 27 35 62 1.051 0.3861 0.3852 1.1091 1.1064
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Miami D1 NCHC SR 24 1 1 2 0.083
2024-25 Miami D1 NCHC JR 34 4 3 7 0.206
2023-24 Miami D1 NCHC SO 36 2 1 3 0.083
2022-23 Miami D1 NCHC FR 25 2 1 3 0.120
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2022-23 · Miami
-52.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15512
Forward overall
#794
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2009-10
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2014-15
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2013-14
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.