← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gage Leonard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-06-02 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 52 4 7 11 0.211 0.0777 0.0855 0.2232 0.2456
2024-25 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 57 10 13 23 0.404 0.1482 0.1553 0.4259 0.4463
2025-26 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 57 18 16 34 0.597 0.2192 0.2189 0.6296 0.6287
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31559
Forward overall
#1697
Forward born in 2006
#2945
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2013-14
0.15
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
NAHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
NAHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.89
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

Hamline · 2024-25
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2000-01
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.