IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Linas Dedinas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-11 Country: Lithuania
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 27 8 14 22 0.815 0.1572 0.1572 0.3729 0.3729
2022-23 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 32 11 12 23 0.719 0.1387 0.1387 0.3289 0.3289
2023-24 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 27 6 2 8 0.296 0.1052 0.1071 0.3111 0.3168
2024-25 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 56 4 11 15 0.268 0.0952 0.0919 0.2813 0.2717
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC — 24 2 4 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2025-26 · Albertus Magnus
+198.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42964
Forward overall
#2838
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Witzel
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel McNamara
Saint John's · 2012-13
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Dunn
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.