IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Sullo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Kimball Union NE-Prep 33 10 12 22 0.667 0.1321 0.1321 0.3037 0.3037
2022-23 Kimball Union NE-Prep 33 10 18 28 0.849 0.1681 0.1681 0.3866 0.3866
2023-24 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 27 2 6 8 0.296 0.1089 0.1085 0.3127 0.3116
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 15 0 1 1 0.067
2024-25 Trinity D3 NESCAC — 12 0 1 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2024-25 · Trinity
-26.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13990
Forward overall
#646
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vito Carlo
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
David Poirier
Skidmore · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Henry Wilson
Salem State · 2023-24
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.