IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayden Zimmerman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-04-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Janesville Jets NAHL 19 3 2 5 0.263 0.0967 0.0912 0.2778 0.2619
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 28 10 17 27 0.964
2024-25 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 28 10 17 27 0.964
2023-24 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 28 10 17 27 0.964
2022-23 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 28 10 17 27 0.964
2021-22 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 28 10 17 27 0.964
2020-21 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 28 10 17 27 0.964

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16196
Defenseman overall
#2956
Defenseman born in 2003
#5112
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Campbell Balk
Endicott · 2018-19
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Charles Widmar
St. Olaf · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Fagan
Norwich · 2023-24
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.