← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Laferriere Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-08 Country: USA
Providence
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Northeast Generals NAHL 35 0 4 4 0.114 0.0420 0.0438 0.1208 0.1260
2024-25 Northeast Generals NAHL 45 1 10 11 0.244 0.0898 0.0889 0.2583 0.2558
2025-26 Elmira Aviators NAHL 38 1 1 2 0.053 0.0193 0.0182 0.0556 0.0523
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26164
Defenseman overall
#4069
Defenseman born in 2005
#6743
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Providence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Providence
BCHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Providence
USHL 2023-24
0.20
actual FR PPG at Providence
NAHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Providence

D2/3 Comparables

Anna Maria · 2017-18
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2009-10
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2017-18
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.