← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Perunovich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Edina High USHS-MN 25 0 5 5 0.200 0.0253 0.0243 0.0486 0.0466
2015-16 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Elite 29 0 14 14 0.483 0.0446 0.0463 0.1106 0.1148
2016-17 Northeast Generals NAHL 60 0 16 16 0.267 0.0980 0.0967 0.2815 0.2777
2017-18 Northeast Generals NAHL 58 3 25 28 0.483 0.1774 0.1662 0.5096 0.4774
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Providence D1 HockeyEast SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 17 0 1 1 0.059
2018-19 Providence D1 HockeyEast 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12081
Defenseman overall
#1885
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2010-11
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.