IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Horn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-08-26 Country: USA
Princeton
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 8 1 1 2 0.250 0.0919 0.1068 0.2639 0.3066
2024-25 — NAHL 51 4 11 15 0.294 0.1081 0.1199 0.3104 0.3444
2025-26 Elmira Aviators NAHL 59 5 18 23 0.390 0.1432 0.1518 0.4114 0.4362
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11743
Defenseman overall
#1572
Defenseman born in 2007
#4031
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Princeton Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Joseph Grabowski
NAHL 2012-13
0.14
actual FR PPG at Princeton
Nick Marciano
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.08
actual FR PPG at Princeton
Tyler Rubin
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.19
actual FR PPG at Princeton
Noah de la Durantaye
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.36
actual FR PPG at Princeton

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Jones
University of New England · 2014-15
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Morin
Wisconsin-Stout · 2005-06
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cade Baker
Endicott · 2021-22
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.