IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

J.J. Lemieux Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Taft NE-Prep 5 3 1 4 0.800 0.1543 0.1543 0.3661 0.3661
2021-22 Taft NE-Prep 21 6 4 10 0.476 0.0919 0.0919 0.2179 0.2179
2022-23 Taft NE-Prep 26 17 20 37 1.423 0.2745 0.2745 0.6512 0.6512
2023-24 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 17 0 2 2 0.118 0.0418 0.0406 0.1235 0.1199
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC — 11 5 2 7 0.636
2024-25 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC — 9 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32327
Forward overall
#1937
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Martyn
Fredonia · 2016-17
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Bresser
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2015-16
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Riesgraf
Saint John's · 2012-13
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.