← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-10 Country: USA
Augustana
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 27 9 9 18 0.667 0.0737 0.0728 0.3499 0.3504
2024-25 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 45 7 23 30 0.667 0.0737 0.0690 0.2112 0.1978
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 10 1 1 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2025-26 · Lake Forest
+231.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35956
Forward overall
#2215
Forward born in 2004
#1612
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Augustana Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.43
actual FR PPG at Augustana
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.35
actual FR PPG at Augustana
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.35
actual FR PPG at Augustana
BCHL 2021-22
0.46
actual FR PPG at Augustana

D2/3 Comparables

Finlandia · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2024-25
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.