← New Search ↗ Social Card

Antonio Venuto Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-02-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Minot Minotauros NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 53 15 13 28 0.528 0.1941 0.2003 0.5576 0.5753
2019-20 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 48 16 10 26 0.542 0.3195 0.3195 1.6269 1.6269
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast 35 8 6 14 0.400
2023-24 Ferris State D1 CCHA SR 36 12 14 26 0.722
2022-23 Ferris State D1 CCHA JR 34 6 9 15 0.441
2021-22 Ferris State D1 CCHA SO 28 2 3 5 0.179
2020-21 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 22 3 6 9 0.409
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2020-21 · Ferris State
+138.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17671
Forward overall
#785
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2022-23
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Albertus Magnus · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2016-17
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.