← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Halverson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-26 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Northeast Generals NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 NAHL 57 8 18 26 0.456 0.1693 0.1723 0.4829 0.4915
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Middlebury D3 NESCAC 23 2 6 8 0.348
2006-07 Trinity D3 SR 25 12 15 27 1.080
2005-06 Trinity D3 JR 25 9 10 19 0.760
2004-05 Trinity D3 SO 26 11 14 25 0.962
2003-04 Trinity D3 FR 26 8 10 18 0.692

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24472
Forward overall
#1404
Forward born in 2005
#2634
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Miami (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2012-13
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2017-18
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.