IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Padraic Whited Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-19 Country: USA
Marian
NCHA D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 37 2 13 15 0.405 0.0509 0.0556 0.1280 0.1397
2023-24 Maine Nordiques NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 31 0 2 2 0.065 0.0237 0.0238 0.0681 0.0684
2025-26 — NAHL 42 3 9 12 0.286 0.1050 0.1003 0.3016 0.2880
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20126
Defenseman overall
#3479
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Marian Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Clay Cross
0.38
actual FR PPG at Marian
Brendan Roberts
0.78
actual FR PPG at Marian
Jake Howie
0.67
actual FR PPG at Marian
Lane Janssen
0.00
actual FR PPG at Marian

D2/3 Comparables

Kale Kane
Norwich · 2016-17
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Lumsden
Fredonia · 2001-02
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Williams
SUNY Oswego · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.