← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joel Määttä Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-06 Country: Finland
2022 · Round 7, Pick #222  ·  Edmonton Oilers Edmonton Oilers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Jokerit U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 40 5 9 14 0.350 0.1897 0.2158 0.5293 0.6022
2019-20 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 43 11 14 25 0.581 0.3430 0.3430 1.7462 1.7462
2020-21 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 52 9 11 20 0.385 0.2269 0.2269 1.1551 1.1551
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 35 9 18 27 0.771
2023-24 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 26 4 5 9 0.346
2022-23 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 36 7 7 14 0.389
2021-22 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 32 3 3 6 0.188
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2021-22 · Vermont
1.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19771
Forward overall
#1058
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Michigan (1.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Providence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2014-15
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2013-14
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.