IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen King Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-14 Country: USA
SUNY Geneseo
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Vernon Vipers BCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 57 24 34 58 1.018 0.3738 0.3783 1.0754 1.0884
2025-26 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 44 17 33 50 1.136 0.4175 0.4020 1.2011 1.1565
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7871
Forward overall
#289
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

SUNY Geneseo Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Michel Bond
1.08
actual FR PPG at SUNY Geneseo
Kris Heeres
1.04
actual FR PPG at SUNY Geneseo
Richard Manley
1.15
actual FR PPG at SUNY Geneseo
Anthony Marra
1.16
actual FR PPG at SUNY Geneseo

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Herdt
Concordia · 2015-16
1.273 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Payden Benning
Curry · 2007-08
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Maxim Maziarchuk
Morrisville · 2023-24
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.