← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexander Servagno Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 48 9 12 21 0.438 0.2689 0.2689 1.2890 1.2890
2020-21 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 49 11 12 23 0.469 0.2885 0.2885 1.3829 1.3829
2021-22 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 59 15 26 41 0.695 0.4272 0.4094 2.0473 1.9620
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Penn State D1 BigTen SR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 17 0 1 1 0.059
2023-24 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 30 2 4 6 0.200
2022-23 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 19 2 2 4 0.210
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2022-23 · Penn State
-39.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11857
Forward overall
#579
Forward born in 2002
#1147
in USHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2005-06
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.