IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

August Classon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-08-03 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Djurgårdens IF U20 SHL-J20 43 1 10 11 0.256 0.1422 0.1433 0.3408 0.3434
2023-24 Djurgårdens IF U20 SuperElit 33 8 16 24 0.727 0.2870 0.2752 0.9877 0.9471
2024-25 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 45 8 21 29 0.644 0.2368 0.2265 0.6802 0.6505
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3016
Defenseman overall
#722
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bradley Robbins
Hobart · 2011-12
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Johnson
Salem State · 2003-04
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kullan Daikawa
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.