IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Watson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-03 Country: USA
Chatham
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Canterbury NE-Prep 29 2 5 7 0.241 0.0478 0.0478 0.1100 0.1100
2023-24 Canterbury NE-Prep 29 6 11 17 0.586 0.1161 0.1161 0.2671 0.2671
2024-25 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 51 6 15 21 0.412 0.1513 0.1491 0.4347 0.4283
2025-26 — NAHL 26 4 3 7 0.269 0.0989 0.0926 0.2841 0.2660
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38627
Forward overall
#2416
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

Chatham Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ben Lamm
0.29
actual FR PPG at Chatham
Brock Forrest
0.57
actual FR PPG at Chatham
Camden Davis
0.46
actual FR PPG at Chatham
Tyler Samodral
0.59
actual FR PPG at Chatham

D2/3 Comparables

Jeff Forsythe
Wisconsin-Superior · 2008-09
0.621 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lionel Landry
Lebanon Valley · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Solat
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.