← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Kramer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-07-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 58 3 25 28 0.483 0.1774 0.1866 0.5096 0.5359
2019-20 Fargo Force USHL 34 3 16 19 0.559 0.3296 0.3296 1.6783 1.6783
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Western Michigan D1 NCHC 42 2 15 17 0.405
2023-24 American International D1 AHA GR 35 10 12 22 0.629
2022-23 American International D1 AHA SR 35 6 17 23 0.657
2021-22 American International D1 AHA JR 36 3 8 11 0.306
2020-21 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 22 0 12 12 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2020-21 · Robert Morris
+209.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3631
Defenseman overall
#799
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2018-19
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2008-09
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.