← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmy Glynn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-02-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 53 6 9 15 0.283 0.1040 0.1119 0.2987 0.3215
2018-19 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 53 9 24 33 0.623 0.2287 0.2359 0.6572 0.6779
2019-20 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 45 7 11 18 0.400 0.2360 0.2360 1.2014 1.2014
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SR 35 8 7 15 0.429
2023-24 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC JR 39 9 6 15 0.385
2022-23 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 30 4 5 9 0.300
2021-22 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 33 5 6 11 0.333
2020-21 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 25 2 5 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2020-21 · Nebraska Omaha
+75.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25802
Forward overall
#1239
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2005-06
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2017-18
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.