IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Klevby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-21 Country: Sweden
Endicott
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Rögle BK U20 SHL-J20 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Rögle BK U20 SuperElit 38 2 4 6 0.158 0.0623 0.0620 0.2175 0.2163
2024-25 Almtuna IS U20 SuperElit 24 11 0 11 0.458 0.1808 0.1707 0.6314 0.5962
2025-26 Maine Nordiques NAHL 44 21 9 30 0.682 0.2505 0.2362 0.7206 0.6794
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23345
Forward overall
#1294
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Endicott Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Louie Kamienski
1.00
actual FR PPG at Endicott
Connor Beatty
1.33
actual FR PPG at Endicott
Thomas Pisciotta
0.70
actual FR PPG at Endicott
Jack Kilty
0.53
actual FR PPG at Endicott

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Manning
Worcester State · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Marinac
SUNY Brockport · 2012-13
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Payne
Gustavus Adolphus · 2017-18
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.