← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Roberts Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-19 Country: USA
Salve Regina
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 St. Paul’s School NE-Prep 24 6 4 10 0.417 0.0825 0.0825 0.1898 0.1898
2022-23 Kent School NE-Prep 26 10 13 23 0.885 0.1752 0.1752 0.4030 0.4030
2023-24 Kent School NE-Prep 28 12 24 36 1.286 0.2547 0.2547 0.5858 0.5858
2024-25 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 46 4 5 9 0.196 0.0719 0.0713 0.2066 0.2049
2025-26 NAHL 54 3 12 15 0.278 0.1021 0.0962 0.2932 0.2764
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35122
Forward overall
#2147
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

Salve Regina Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.71
actual FR PPG at Salve Regina
0.00
actual FR PPG at Salve Regina
0.35
actual FR PPG at Salve Regina
0.48
actual FR PPG at Salve Regina

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2010-11
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2024-25
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.