← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kirklan Irey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 51 6 12 18 0.353 0.1398 0.1503 0.3705 0.3984
2019-20 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 45 6 11 17 0.378 0.2322 0.2322 1.1131 1.1131
2020-21 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 51 10 8 18 0.353 0.2169 0.2169 1.0397 1.0397
2021-22 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 52 9 13 22 0.423 0.2601 0.2306 1.2465 1.1052
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SR 36 1 9 10 0.278
2024-25 Bemidji State D1 CCHA JR 38 11 13 24 0.632
2023-24 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SO 37 8 7 15 0.405
2022-23 Bemidji State D1 CCHA FR 23 1 3 4 0.174
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2022-23 · Bemidji State
2.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22434
Forward overall
#1103
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2010-11
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2024-25
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.